Right now there is a “controversy” going on because of Trump’s “ban” on men who want to pretend they are women:
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he plans to reinstate a ban on transgender individuals from serving “in any capacity” in the US armed forces.
The decision reversed a policy initially approved by the Defense Department under President Barack Obama, which was still under final review, that would allow transgender individuals to openly serve in the military. Defense Secretary James Mattis announced last month that he was delaying enactment of the plan to begin allowing transgender individuals to join the US military.
“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” Trump said in a series of tweets Wednesday morning. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.” (source)
The worst place for any of this discussion right now is Facebook, because right now I am seeing the “conservative” side line up in support of LGB sodomites in the military but not the “T”- transgender- one. Literally the discussion is moving in the way of which kinds of disorders are “acceptable” versus which ones are not.
What needs to happen right now is a stop to all of this talk about “controversy,” because there is no controversy at all. The entire conversation that is being had right now about “gays” versus “transgenders” and the whole spectrum in between- do we accept one type of disorder and not the other, etc.- is a quintessential example of the distractions masquerading as “conversations” that define public discourse today. There are two levels to this deception, which are the nature of the act between the sodomites and then the acceptability of the act in society.
The difference between LGB and T is as insignificant as the difference between HIV and AIDS. It’s a death sentence for anybody. Acting like there is actually a fundamental divide and even a “more moral” side only feeds the dialectic of perverts such as the one above to promote more filth, disease, and disorder.
As regards the nature of the act, there is no difference between L, G, B, and T, because the movement defines itself in terms of their choice to masturbate by means of another man’s rectum (or with the sapphic equivalent for women). It’s aim is to attack Christianity by the promotion of a “personal morality” that acts as a justification for license. Christianity offers order that reflects its divine nature, the LGBT offers chaos that reflects its nature as hellspawn. The sins of the LGBT, which the Bible speaks cry out to Heaven for vengeance and which called down the wrath of God on Sodom, which the saints say are so vile that even the demons of hell are disgusted by them, have no good in them that can be reconciled with. It is irrelevant if a sodomite is a “military veteran,” a “conservative patriot,” or any other human title because the choice to sin or not sin is the choice between righteousness or immorality, and is the only matter of relevance to God. It is a direct, open choice between good or evil.
The “controversy” being witnessed right now between the “LGB” versus the “T” is what we have discussed before in our article about the rise of National Socialism and its historical and contemporary controvery with Communist or “Marxist” socialism. In terms of socialist theory, there is no conflict between the National Socialists and the Communists because both are socialists. The difference is that the National Socialists, as indicated by their name, view their application of Socialism through a Nationalist view, whereas the Communist takes an Internationalist view. This conflict even took place within Communist Russia itself between Joseph Stalin and Lev Bronstein (a.k.a. Trotsky), since the former wanted a nationalized Communism whereas the latter wanted an internationalized Communism. Both men loved the evils of socialism and the Communist approach, but they fought bitterly over the philosophical differences in application.
This fight is mirrored today in the sexual politics of the “LGB” versus “T” controversy, since the “LGB” is choosing a masculinized form of homosexual perversity, whereas the “T” is choosing a feminized homosexuality. However, there is NO winner here because both groups want the same end, which is the propagation of homosexual perversity, just on their terms.
If it were not bad enough that notable segments of society are fighting over their right to sin, it is worsened by the fact that the public dialogue taking place about this “conflict” is taking sides within the debate instead of addressing the issue of the nature of the acts. “Conservatives” and “liberals” for the most part split on political lines are publicly affiliating themselves with the two warring factions of sodomites and by doing so are promoting one type of sodomite behavior against another type. This is nothing more than another manifestation of the Hegelian dialectic.
The Hegelian dialectic was named after the German positivist philosopher Georg Hegel, and it is a way reasoning that is used to determine truth not by seeking an absolute standard, but through dialogue between two opposing points and seeking a resolution by “meeting in the middle.” The way it works is that the first person proposes an idea, which Hegel called a “thesis,” and another person proposes the opposite idea, called the “antithesis.” Since the assumption is that “truth” lies somewhere between these two extremes, the “thesis” and “antithesis” argue with each other to form a new outcome, which Hegel called the “synthesis.” If “truth” has not yet been reached, then the “synthesis” is proposed as the new “thesis,” a corresponding anthesis is proposed as well, and a new “synthesis” is developed. This is done as many times as in necessary until the “truth” is elucidated.
The Marxists of the 19th century loved the Hegelian dialectic and is still their favorite choice of argument, as well as that of many a tyrant. What makes the Hegelian dialectic so attractive to such people is because it makes no presumptions of absolute truth. Rather, it says that truth is the product of two extremes instead of being its own end, and that this synthesized truth can be realized through argument.
Remember the argument about a frog and a pot of boiling water? If you drop a frog in a pot of boiling water, he jumps out immediately, but if you put him in a pot of warm water and slowly turn up the heat, he will be cooked to death without even realizing it. The Hegelian dialectic is the intellectual equivalent of the frog in warm water- it allows men with bad intentions to slowly establish bad ideas in other men without them realizing it and in such a a way that they eventually come to accept their position without even realizing consciously they have changed their own views.
The cure for the Hegelian dialectic is fundamentalism, and by that I do not mean just religious, but intellectual as well. It is the classical philosophical assumption that truth is fixed and absolute, unchanging, and it is for man to understand conform himself to that truth instead of making his opinion the arbiter of truth.
What the LGBT has done over the past 30+ years in American society and really, throughout the world has been to condition the world through this dialectic structure to accept homosexuality. Since the structure of Christianity have been gravely eroded, its has been a very effective tool by which to convince otherwise normal, well balanced people to accept increasingly perverse forms of evil as something normal they do not notice until they have already accepted them, if they even come to such a realization at all. It is the reason why a half-century ago people for the most part acknowledged that homosexual behavior was evil or at least, abnormal and a mental disorder, and now people who oppose homosexual perversity are now being called the ones who have “mental disorders” and are literally facing economic ruin and social ostracism for stating what God Himself has to say about the act in His Word.
The Gateway to Hell, a place of perpetual fire in Derveze, Tajikistan that has been burning since the 1970’s following a natural gas accident that continues to be fed by the Earth. This is the end of the LGBT. I say it as a sobering reminder of the gravity of sin and where it leads to.
I mention this in the context of this article because it correlates to the rising phenomeon in the conservative movement of supporing the “LGB” while simply opposing the “T.” We first exposed this Ted’s video on Dennis Prager in which the man admitted that he believes in sodomizing teenage boys, supports homosexuality, and is interested in gay romance stories. Keep in mind he is a major “conservative” voice, and so he is not simply an isolated incident, but reflective of the changes taking place in the entire structure of American conservativism itself, which is really it simply shows itself for what it really always was, which is simply another side of the Hegelian dialectic promoting the same evil just in a different form.
But L, G, B, or T, it does not matter what letter or letters of the LGBT alphabet you cling to because it all spells only one word- SIN. The wage of sin is always death, and especially unrepentant sin held as virtue. The only voice that needs to be heard in this entire ridiculous dialogue are the words of God from scripture:
“I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish. Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.” -Luke 13:3-5
Any other voice is just the clamor of devils.