By Walid Shoebat
The State Department announced a $600,000 expense for a study that says that being heterosexual (that is, not a pervert sodomite), could make you into an Islamic terrorist. As we read in a report from Fox News (thanks to, the Right Scoop)
The State Department announced a new $600,000 taxpayer-funded study that suggests “ideals of masculinity” in Kenya are contributing to terrorism.
The department’s Bureau of Counterterrorism is seeking a nonprofit group to “explore gender identities of boys and men in Kenya.” The grant proposal states that men being “tough, heterosexual, aggressive, unemotional, and achieving” can make them vulnerable to joining Islamic extremist groups.
“Gender is increasingly recognized as an essential aspect to understanding and countering violent extremism throughout the world,” the State Department said. “To date, research and interventions on gender in Kenya have predominantly focused on the role of women and girls in violent extremism. However, men and boys are disproportionately recruited by and join terrorist groups and carry out terrorist operations. In Kenya, there currently exists no CVE [countering violent extremism] programming dedicated to the role of gender of boys and men and vulnerability to violent extremism.”
To remedy this, the State Department will spend up to $592,500 on the “Masculinity and Violent Extremism” study, which will be awarded to an American nonprofit or nongovernmental organization later this year.
The study will “determine existing knowledge and gaps on male gender and violent extremism as well as explore gender identities of boys and men in Kenya.”
The grant proposal blames Kenya’s “patriarchal” society of “tough, heterosexual” men for problems facing the developing country.
Notice they are making the focus on Kenya, an African country. This is part of the sodomite conspiracy to spread and advance the homosexual agenda in Africa where the agents of sodom are having much difficulty in succeeding in their demonic goals. This whole idea of “ISIS HATES GAY PEOPLE” is all part of a ploy to make homosexuality appealing to society; it is also part of a strategy to make people think that being anti-sodom is pro-jiadist terrorist. This is the tactic that children of Belial like Pamela Geller — who has said that being anti-Sharia is ‘pro-LGBT.’
The sodomite agenda, or the religion of sodomism, is no different than the Islamic supremacist ideology. New research confirms what we have been saying for years: homosexuality is an intricate part of the Islamic social contract.
Recently the media has been speaking about how ISIS threw a 15 year old boy off a building for being homosexual. While they are portraying this as “homophobic” violence, the realty is that this youth was being sodomized by a major ISIS leader named Abu Zaid al-Jazrawi. Al-Jazrawi was not executed, he was simply flogged and made to continue the jihad in north western Iraq. If ISIS was truly “homophobic,” and akin to Christianity’s stance against homosexuality, then why wasn’t this sodomite terrorist executed as well? The reason is because al-Jazrawi was the one sodomizing, while the 15 year old was the one who was sodomized. Al-Jazrawi was thus considered the ‘dominant’ one while the other the inferior and dominated. Therefore, this cannot be considered a stance for family values, but merely a system of perversion.
Subhi Nahas, a homosexual from Syria, made a very telling observation in regards to this perverse situation amongst the terrorists:
If a man has sex with another man, the two parties are the receptive one and the ‘inserter.’ If you’re the receptive party, you’re doomed. You’re seen as sodomized, someone has done this to you, you’re the abomination. If you’re the inserter, you are in control, you’re functional, you can reproduce.
Nahas also said that he heard that ISIS has been sparing effeminate homosexuals “for the pleasure of older men,” while the “masculine” men thought to be homosexual have been the ones being killed. Michael Luongo, editor of Gay Travels in the Muslim World, said:
It goes to the idea that in some parts of the Middle East and other cultures being the penetrator is OK because that is not unmanly. … If the sex was with a 15-year-old boy I would be certain he was the one who was penetrated, who was raped. The hypocrisy would also be added to in that it would be started by the desires of the guy who was not harshly punished, by the commander. … We have seen this type of hypocrisy in other so-called religious groups such as the Taliban. The horror is added to by the sense the 15-year-old was essentially raped and then murdered for his having been raped.
ISIS are a bunch of homosexual, anti-Christian murderers. They are the purest form of the homosexual agenda, and they are just as evil and anti-Christian, as the reprobate sodomites in the West. There is a recent report that reveals that ISIS officials have homo sex with other men in their tents.
According to the report:
In a joint statement released on August 13 2014 two senior United Nations officials spoke out against Isis’ “barbaric acts” of sexual violence and “savage rapes” of Iraqi minorities. “We are gravely concerned by continued reports of acts of violence, including sexual violence against women and teenage girls and boys belonging to Iraqi minorities,” Zainab Hawa Bangura and Nickolay Mladenov said.
One detail in Arango’s story, however, stands out: it is the reference to homosexual sex in an Isis training camp. “He [Barho] said he saw men having sex with other men behind the tents in the desert night.”
There are homosexuals in superior levels of leadership of ISIS, such as one “prince” of the group who sodomizes new recruits as a way of initiation. Therefore, these Christians who are being killing by ISIS, are martyrs not only slain by Muslims, but by homosexuals.
What we see being done by ISIS is really sodomite on sodomite violence. This is typical sodomite behavior, which we have seen, and continue to see, in the Western world.
Amsterdam is one of the homosexual capitals of the world, right up there with San Francisco, and is notorious for pedophilia and a hub for perverts and reprobates. A police investigation in Amsterdam done in the 80s came to this conclusion:
The number of offenses, taking place in a homosexual context, is conspicuous. Almost each case concerns elderly homosexuals murdered from motives of robbery and extortion by persons invited into their homes. (…) In one out of four of all murder cases the victim was homosexual. All the men were of dutch origin. The homosexual man, making his contacts either on the street or in the bars, seems to run higher risk of being the victim of a life threatening felony.
In between the years of 1980 and 1988, one out of every four murder cases involved a homosexual being killed, by another homosexual.
In these murders a homosexual killed another homosexual. Yet the sodomite activists would not say that this is “homophobic” or “anti-gay” violence. In the context of ISIS, you have homosexual jihadists killing other homosexuals deemed as “dominated” since they were sodomized. In both cases, it is sodomite on sodomite murder. Yet the homosexuals ignore the first case, and are using the case with ISIS as a means of propaganda to show that sodomites are being persecuted, just like the Christians are being persecuted.
They want to make it out to be that ISIS is just “full of hate,” and that they just “kill gays, Christians or anyone not like them.” All of this talk is propaganda, done in order to both minimize Christian persecution as just another form of oppression amongst other oppressions, and also as a means to portray true Christians who are fighting the sodomite agenda as being “no different than ISIS.”
The reality is that ISIS’ killing of sodomites cannot be considered as equal to the implementation of Christian law against sodomites, rather it is another form of sodomite on sodomite crime. It is also an ancient and oriental perversion and ideology, in which the penetrator, dominating the penetrated, kills the penetrated as a further expression of dominance.
Essentially it is really no different than when sodomites kill each other, only that this is ignored or covered up by sodomites while they sensationalize ISIS as a way to parallel Christians with Islamic terrorists.
Amongst homosexual jihadists there is the rule that the penetrator is not homosexual, only the penetrated. What is not being said is that this perverted way of thinking is found amongst sodomites in the West. According to Reiss (1961) and Lloyd (1976), who both did studies on homosexual perversities,
“You’re not queer if the other guy does the blowing.” (Lloyd)
“No matter how many queers a guy goes with, if he goes for the money, that don’t make him a queer.” (Reiss)
Homosexual jihadists have the same exact perverted views as the sodomites. As one Moroccan Muslim homosexual and pedophile has been quoted as saying:
“If I am fucked, I’ll become homosexual. Its like a disease that passes on from one person to another. After being fucked, once you know the feeling, you might even start to like it one day. You will be the one looking for a young boy. They can’t defend themselves. They’ll do anything.”
This entire demonic and warped way of thinking stems from one diabolical desire: domination and superiority. The one who is sodomized is ‘dominated,’ and thus he is the sodomite, the inferior person who is not a human being. One Dutch homosexual prostitute has been quoted as saying about other sodomites:
“They’re pathetic, I despise them, they’re inferior people. They aren’t real men. I am. I am superior to them. But I need the money, thats all there is to it. They mean nothing to me, I just lie there, I let them pine for me and make them pay for it. They can count on that.” (Bullinga et al. 1982:153)
Amazingly you would never see sodomite activists take these words as an example of a “homophobic” statement. Why? Because it is being said by a homosexual about other homosexuals who he deems as inferior. The same can be said of ISIS: it consists of violent homosexual men who kill other homosexuals who they deem as inferior and dominated and hence worthy of death.
The violence being done by ISIS against other homosexuals is not anti-homosexual, but pro-homosexual; it is intricate to the homosexual ideology, which is a total degradation of human life and a violent bent on domination and superiority. Sodomites killing each other is simply an innate part of sodomism, which is why sodomites in the West and homosexual jihadists kill one another. One Turkish homosexual youth spoke of how likely it was for him to be killed by another sodomite:
“You never know what might happen. There could be some friends at his house and they might kill you.”
Why aren’t the sodomites bringing up this reality to bring attention to “homophobic violence”? Because they do not want to bring any light on the real homosexual underworld, the dark side that is kept hidden behind the HGTV sodomites that are presented all the time on television.
These sodomites in Europe and America who kill each other would be commonly known as homosexuals. But ISIS, they are more frequently perceived as “conservative” religious Muslim people who — like the “right wing” in America — hate “gay people.” But if the reality was truly registered in the minds of the masses, this collective delusion would be dissipated by the reality that ISIS and Islamic imperialism and the sodomite agenda have a lot more in common than is thought.
It is true that ISIS desires to advance a heresy — unitarianism — and the “lgbt” wants to advance perversion, but we cannot differentiate between the two in such a strict way. Because the “unitarian church” of America also wants to advance unitarianism and homosexuality, just as Islamic terrorists do. For example on the official website for the Unitarian Universalist Association it says, “Unitarians stress on the unity of God as opposed to trinity…” In the same heretical site it reads:
Most Unitarian Universalist Christians believe in God, but not the traditional God-as-Trinity that most Christian churches promote. The UU Christian God is all-loving, as our Universalist forbears taught, and a unity, as our Unitarian forebears taught. This God is too big to be contained in one person, one book, one tradition, or one time in history.
Notice this emphasis on the “unity” of God; it is the same heretical fixation as what is found in Islam, in which “tawhid” or the unitarian nature of the Islamic god is taught. While this cult teaches unitarianism, it also trumps the sodomite agenda, teaching in its site: “We create inclusive religious communities and work for LGBTQ justice and equity as a core part of who we are.” By “LGBTQ justice” it is no doubt referring to the persecution of Christian owned businesses who refuse to acquiesce to the sodomite agenda.
The unitarian cult makes both homosexuality and anti-trinitarianism as intricate and core to its ideology, just as Islam makes homosexuality and “tawhid” as central to its religion and political system. Hence, in the Ottoman empire, homosexuality was intricate to its society, while at the same time destroying Orthodox Christianity was its aim.
One of the differences is the tone, and this is what most allow to determine their opinions. The Muslims have a harsh tone, while the Western sodomites come under the guise of “openness”, humor, and a very repugnant attempt at being agreeable. This strategy has become very effective in the West. While Muslims are referred to as barbarians and primitive, sodomites are esteemed as progressive and worthy of toleration. This perception is solely based on the modern world’s reception to tones and connotations, all drenched in feminist and modernist ideas.
The Islamist and the sodomite agendas are one in the same thing, the only difference is their appearances.
In the war between good and evil, homosexuality is the central aspect of the side of the diabolical. Its not “just another sin,” it is an innate part of the nature of evil and despotism. When you look at how ISIS, for example, kills people, by slicing off their necks, burning them alive in cages, strapping onto people and then blowing them up to pieces, it is most conspicuous that they are a deviant people through and through. They kill just like the many sodomite serial killers have done. There is no doubt that if the sodomites in America had the power, they would not hesitate to conduct a genocide of Christians. The pagan Roman Empire was dominated by homosexuality, and it tried to exterminate all Christians; the Persian Zoroastrian empire was filled with sodomites and it too tried to destroy Christianity; the Ottoman Empire was extremely homosexual and it too committed genocide against Christians. In a letter written by the Byzantine Emperor Alexius Comnenus to Robert, count of Flanders, the Emperor describes how the Muslims savagely and ceaselessly raped Christian women, and that after some time, grew tired of women and turned on Christian men, sodomizing them by force. Excerpts from the letter were quoted and rendered by the Medieval historian Guibert of Nogent as follows:
They took virgins and made them public prostitutes, since they were never deterred by shame or feeling for martial fidelity. Mothers were violated in the presence of their daughters, raped over and over again by different men, while their daughters were compelled, not only to watch, but to sing obscene songs and to dance. Then they changed places, and the suffering, which is painful and shameful to speak of, was inflicted upon the daughters, while the filthy activity was adorned by the obscene songs of the unfortunate mothers. Finally reverence for all that was called Christian was handed over to the brothel. When the female sex was not spared (an action which might be excused since it is at least in accord with nature), they became worse than animals, breaking all human laws by turning on men. Their lust overflowed to the point that the execrable and profoundly intolerable crime of sodomy, which they committed against men of middle or low station, they also committed against a certain bishop, killing him. (Guibert of Nogent, book 1, p. 33, ed. Echo Library)
In light of all this history, I will say emphatically that the sodomites in the West want to do the same policies of extermination and sexual torture. There is no doubt in my mind that if these sodomites had their way they would seize Christian boys and rape them, and they would gang rape Christian men just as they have done in the past and in our own times (for modern examples, click here, here, here, here, here, here).
Deviancy never resides in one desire, like murder; deviancy resonates in all desires, it becomes a part of one’s whole person. Deranged and disturbing lusts for blood resonates in one’s sexual urges, and these are always aberrant and debased. It all comes down to one’s religious beliefs. All deviancy originates from a disordered view of God. If one’s soul is loving, then that soul will treat his or her spouse with love. But if one’s soul is darkened by evil, then that person will not care for love, harmony, compassion, no, not even the natural order. Chaos is embraced, order is mutilated, and the entire divinely created system of natured is warred against.
St. Paul states that though humankind, entering into paganism, “knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened” (Romans 1:21), and that “they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts, and of creeping things” (Romans 1:23), and that at this point “God gave them up to the desires of their heart” (Romans 1:24), and they “changed the truth of God into a lie” (Romans 1:25), and at this point, “women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature” (Romans 1:26) and “the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.” (Romans 1:27)
What we learn from the words of the Apostle is that heresy, or the changing of the “truth of God into a lie”, eventually leads to homosexuality, and homosexuality always leads to violence and chaos. Hence the end result of homosexuality is “Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy.” (Romans 1:29-31)
The jihadists are, in the words of St. Juan de Ribera, “from a school of vicious bestialities”; and in the words of Anna Komnenus “they indulge readily in every kind of sexual license, and if they are circumcised in the flesh they are certainly not so in their passions.” (Ann Komnenus, 10.5) The Muslims are heretics, and as a consequence, homosexuality abounds amongst them.
Let us not forget that sodomism did not first begin in the West, but in the East. The Bible speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah, where in countless men tried break into the home of Lot to rape the two angels. Let us not forget about what happened in Gibeah, in which a mob of homosexuals surrounded a home and said, “Bring forth the man that came into thy house, that we may abuse him.” (Judges 19:22) They wanted to rape the man, they wanted to dominate him, essentially, in a very sadistic and diabolical way.
From these stories of the Scriptures, we know truly what the end result of homosexuality is: violence and an insatiable urge to torture and enslave other human beings. The Canaanites were riddled with homosexuality, and thus when the Hebrews vanquished them, they were bringing in liberation into a land plagued with mortals bent on enslavement: it was the liberation of humanity from the demonic and violent fetters of the devil. The conquest of Canaan was the illumination of divine enlightenment to a humanity blinded from seeing the spirit of civilization.
What homosexual jihadists are doing is merely a continuation of what pagans have been doing for thousands of years, and Christianity is here to continue the crusade of Joshua in the destruction and obliteration of evil — and that includes the destruction of homosexuality. Christ is prefigured by Joshua; the latter was victorious over the human agents of the devil while the Former over the devil himself. Bishop Fulton Sheen said:
“The fact that He was prefigured by Josue [Joshua] indicates that He had the soldierly qualities necessary for the final victory over evil, which would come from the glad acceptance of suffering, unwavering courage, resoluteness of will and unshakable devotion to the Father’s mandate.” (The Life of Christ, ch. 2, p. 25, brackets mine)
In the person of Melchizedek we have the priest who guides the warrior spiritually. After the valorous Abraham crushed the pagans in the first crusade of mankind’s history, Melchizedek came to Abraham with the sacrifice of bread and wine and said:
“Blessed be Abram by the most high God, who created heaven and earth.
And blessed be the most high God, by whose protection the enemies are in thy hands.” (Genesis 14:19-20)
Here the priest is the spiritual guide of the warrior, giving bread and wine to him as sacrifices, and Jesus Christ Who is the Bread and the Wine, is “made a high priest for ever according to the order of Melchisedech” (Hebrews 6:20). If the priesthood of Melchizedek is continued on forever in Jesus Christ, then the warrior order under him is as well continued, under Jesus Christ. Thus, the holy war carried out by Abraham, the sublime Moses, Joshua and all of the other just combatants of sacred history, is continued on in Jesus Christ.
When the Conquistadors entered Mexico they saw, in the words of Diaz, “boys dressed in women’s dress who were earning their living in that perverted occupation” and they saw the wicked priests in “the perverse occupation of sodomites.” The Conquistadors did not tolerate such evil, for they were a continuation of that holy war of the Hebrews when they themselves destroyed Canaan. The Catholic Spaniards uprooted the sodomites in Mexico, under the illumination of Christ, Who came “To enlighten them that sit in darkness” (Luke 1:79).
Where are you Christendom? Why have you gone to sleep? Awaken, O Christendom, and uphold the lantern of enlightenment and shatter to pieces the shadows of the wicked. Cry out with David, O Christendom, “O my God enlighten my darkness.” (Psalm 17:29) Resurrect Christendom, O God, from the dead, and let it commence in its duty to “Declare His glory among the nations, His wonders among all peoples. For the Lord is great and greatly to be praised; He is also to be feared above all gods.” (1 Chronicles 16:24-25)